Friday, 23 December 2011

Have yourself a creepy Bowie Christmas

David Bowie is not the most warm and fuzzy of musicians, I think we can all agree. But thanks to two episodes from his career, he unfortunately manages to infiltrate my every Yuletide. You see, David Bowie is the little boy in The Snowman.

I know. It's weird but it's true.

Here is the original opening to the classic Channel 4 animation, first shown in 1982, featuring Bowie in his super blonde phase:

Unsurprisingly, they don't often show this beginning any more, but the copy I had taped from the telly in the late 80s had it, so it is permanently etched on my soul. 

So it was the young David Jones that went through the most upsetting cartoon loss since Bambi's mother. Perhaps he was so traumatised by the melting of his snowman that it led to a complete psychotic break. His fragile mind created many personalities to deal with the loss of his only friend: Ziggy Stardust, the Thin White Duke, Major Tom. It explains a lot. 

Bowie is also responsible for my least favourite Christmas record - the Little Drummer Boy. The song was already ruined when it was wrote (it's plodding, has no chorus, and goes "pa-rump a pum pum" a lot), but his surreal duet with Bing Crosby really takes the biscuit. Watch the beginning of the video:



Comedy gold, right? Doesn't the chemistry between the two just leap off the screen?

It's good to hear that Bing Crosby thought that some modern music is "really fine", though. The performance was recorded in 1977, so I like to think he's talking about Bony M.

Merry Christmas, everyone!

About this blog

Hello everyone and welcome to Retrovirus. This will be a forum for me to share strange or amazing titbits from the past I find on my travels - whether music, TV, film, fashion or design.

Case in point: an entomologist once told me that the word "titbit" comes from when people worked in the fields and used to snack on whatever creepy crawlies they found. Apparently woodlice taste like prawns, and since they're both crustaceans that kind of makes sense.

Don't worry, most posts will not be about our distant agricultural past as I am mostly interested in the 60s. But why start as I mean to go on?